滚动直线导轨副的滚道中心距误差与承载性能的关系

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2021.18.015

中国机械工程 ›› 2021, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (18): 2254-2261,2267.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2021.18.015

滚动直线导轨副的滚道中心距误差与承载性能的关系

梁医1;王旭东1;王晓艺1;冯健文2;冯本哲1;欧屹1;冯虎田1

1.南京理工大学机械工程学院，南京，210094
2.广东凯特精密机械有限公司，江门，529100

出版日期:2021-09-25 发布日期:2021-10-14
通讯作者: 王旭东(通信作者)，男，1994年生，硕士研究生。研究方向为导轨副互换性、零部件加工质量管控技术。E-mail：WangXuDong4219@ 163.com。
作者简介:梁医，女，1974年生，副教授。研究方向为精密机械测试测量、摩擦磨损与润滑、机械优化设计等。发表论文35篇。 E-mail:liangyi@mail.njust.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2019ZX0401001-005)；
国家自然科学基金(51405233)

Relationship of Raceway Center Distance Errors and Load-bearing Performance of Rolling Linear Guide Pairs

LIANG Yi1;WANG Xudong1;WANG Xiaoyi1;FENG Jianwen2;FENG Benzhe1;OU Yi1;FENG Hutian1

1.School of Mechanical Engineering,Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing，210094
2.Guangdong Kate Precision Machinery Corporation,Jiangmen,Guangdong,529100

Online:2021-09-25 Published:2021-10-14

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 静刚度和摩擦力作为导轨副关键承载性能指标，直接影响导轨副的运动精度及工作状态。基于赫兹接触理论，建立了滚道中心距误差与导轨副摩擦力和静刚度的模型，并结合理论计算模型与控制变量试验研究了导轨、滑块滚道中心距误差及滚珠过盈量对承载性能的影响规律，对比分析了滚道中心距不同误差情况下的摩擦力和静刚度。研究结果表明，静刚度相对误差为2.46%～8.20%，摩擦力相对误差为0.42%～11.33%。理论仿真值和试验实测值的一致性较好。

关键词: 滚动直线导轨副, 滚道中心距, 误差, 摩擦力, 静刚度

Abstract: Static stiffness and friction, as the key load-bearing performance indicators of rolling linear guide pairs, affected the motion accuracy and operation performance directly. Based on Hertz contact theory, a model of raceway center distance errors, the friction forces and static stiffness of the guide rail pairs was established. The theoretical model and controlled variable tests were combined to analyze the influences of the center distance errors for guide rail raceway, slider raceway and ball interference on the bearing performance for the guide rail pairs. The friction forces and static stiffness under different errors of the raceway center distance were compared and analyzed. The results show that the relative errors of static stiffness are as 2.46%～8.20%, and the relative errors of friction are as 0.42%～11.33%. The theoretical simulation values and the experimental values are in good agreement.

Key words: rolling linear guide pair, raceway center distance, error, friction force, static stiffness

中图分类号:

梁医, 王旭东, 王晓艺, 冯健文, 冯本哲, 欧屹, 冯虎田. 滚动直线导轨副的滚道中心距误差与承载性能的关系[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(18): 2254-2261,2267.

LIANG Yi, WANG Xudong, WANG Xiaoyi, FENG Jianwen, FENG Benzhe, OU Yi, FENG Hutian. Relationship of Raceway Center Distance Errors and Load-bearing Performance of Rolling Linear Guide Pairs[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2021, 32(18): 2254-2261,2267.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2021.18.015

http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/Y2021/V32/I18/2254

参考文献

［1］HUNG J P. Load Effect on the Vibration Characteristics of a Stage with Rolling Guides［J］. Journal of Mechanical Science & Technology, 2009, 23(1):89-99.
［2］AL-BENDER F, SYMENS W. Characterization of Frictional Hysteresis in Ball-bearing Guideways［J］. Wear, 2005, 258(11/12):1630-1642.
［3］ZOU H T, WANG B L. Investigation of the Contact Stiffness Variation of Linear Rolling Guides due to the Effects of Friction and Wear during Operation［J］. Tribology International, 2015, 92:472-484.
［4］OHTA H, KITAJIMA Y, KATO S, et al. Effects of Ball Groupings on Ball Passage Vibrations of a Linear Guideway Type Ball Bearing(Pitching and Yawing Ball Passage Vibrations) ［J］. Journal of Tribology, 2006, 129(1):525-532.
［5］陆艮峰. 直线滚动导轨副静动态特性及摩擦特性研究［D］. 南京：东南大学, 2017.
LU Genfeng. Research on Static and Dynamic Characteristics and Friction Characteristics of Linear Rolling Guide［D］. Nanjing:Southeast University, 2017.
［6］SHAW D, SU W L. Stiffness Analysis of Linear Guideways without Preload［J］. Journal of Mecha-nics, 2013, 29(2):281-286.
［7］王民,乐兵兵,裴二阳.基于Hertz接触的滚珠直线导轨副接触刚度建模与分析［J］.北京工业大学学报, 2015, 41(8):1128-1132.
WANG Min，LE Bingbing, PEI Eryang. Modeling and Analysis of Contact Stiffness of Ball Linear Guide Based on Hertz Contact［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2015, 41(8):1128-1132.
［8］张巍,王民,孙乐乐.考虑预紧力和接触角变化的直线滚动导轨副刚度建模与分析［J］.北京工业大学学报, 2018, 44(1):56-63.
ZHANG Wei, WANG Min, SUN Lele. Modeling and Analysis of Stiffness of Linear Rolling Guides Considering Changes in Preload and Contact Angle［J］.Journal of Beijing University of Technology,2018,44(1):56-63.
［9］WANG W, ZHANG Y, LI C. Dynamic Reliability Analysis of Linear Guides in Positioning Precision［J］. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 2017, 116(1):451-464.
［10］耿宝龙. 滚动直线导轨副摩擦分析及试验方法研究［D］. 武汉：华中科技大学, 2012.
GENG Baolong. Research on Friction Analysis and Test Method of Rolling Linear Guide Pair［D］. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2012.
［11］PAWEL D, BERCZYNSKI S, PIOTR P,et al. Static Condensation in Modeling Roller Guides with Preload［J］. Archives of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, 2019, 19(1):1072-1082.
［12］DADALAU A, GROH K, REUH M,et al. Modeling Linear Guide Systems with Co FEM:Equivalent Models for Rolling Contact［J］. Production Engineering, 2012(6):39-46.
［13］MAHDI R, FRIEDRICH B. Experimental and Analytical Investigations on Normal and Angular Stiffness of Linear Guides in Manufacturing Systems［J］. Procedia CIRP, 2016 (41):795-800.
［14］王禹林,李作康,周斌,等.基于全周期分段步加的极小子样加速实验方法［J］.华中科技大学学报(自然科学版),2017,45(6):68-72.
WANG Yulin, LI Zuokang, ZHOU Bin, et al. Device and Method for Simultaneously Measuring Comprehensive Static Stiffness of Linear Guideway［J］. Journal of Huazhong University of Science & Technology（Natural Science Edition）, 2017, 45(6):68-72.
［15］CHEN Y, YING Y. The Strength and Stiffness Analysis of the Fixed Guide Based on the ANSYS Workbench［J］. Non-Ferrous Mining and Metallurgy, 2015(11):69-75.
［16］SUN W, KONG X, WANG B,et al. Statics Modeling and Analysis of Linear Rolling Guideway Considering Rolling Balls Contact［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C:Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science, 2015, 229(1):168-179.
［17］OLARU D N, LORENZ P, RUDY D, et al. Friction in the Circular-arc Grooves Linear Rolling Guidance System［J］. Tribology, 2004, 51(2):12-20.
［18］MAHDI R, STEPHAN K, FRIEDRICH B. Experimental Investigations on Stick-slip Phenomenon and Friction Characteristics of Linear Guides［J］. Procedia Engineering, 2015(100):1023-1031.
［19］TETSUYA M, ATSUHI M, IWAO Y,et al. Measurement and Analysis of Friction Fluctuations in Linear Guideways［J］. CIRP Annals, 2018,67(1):393-396.
［20］龚灿. 滚珠直线导轨副接触问题的动力学分析［D］. 武汉：华中科技大学,2014.
GONG Can. Dynamic Analysis of the Contact Problem of Ball Linear Guide Pair［D］. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 2014.
［21］高永坤.滚动直线导轨过盈量和摩擦特性关系的研究［D］. 无锡：江南大学, 2013.
GAO Yongkun. Research on the Relationship between Interference and Friction Characteristics of Rolling Linear Guides［D］. Wuxi:Jiangnan University, 2013.
［22］OH Kwang-Je, KHIM Gyungho, PARK Chun-Hong, et al. Explicit Modeling and Investigation of Friction Forces in Linear Motion Ball Guides［J］. Tribology International, 2018, 46(7):68-79.

[1]	李小力, 陈威, 闫蓉. 基于BP神经网络的空间轮廓误差自适应补偿 [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1902-1906.
[2]	刘毅, 易旺民, 姚建涛, 王兴达, 余鹏, 赵永生. 狭长空间内重载调姿装配机器人的设计与研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(02): 324-336.
[3]	胡波, 安锦运, 尹来容, 周长江. 小模数齿轮传动的时变啮合刚度计算方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(01): 74-82.
[4]	叶伯生, 金雄程, 黎晗, 邵柏岩, 李晓昆, 李思澳. 伪目标迭代生成的机器人误差补偿算法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(01): 136-143.
[5]	陈光宇, 翁直威, 张松, . 考虑尺寸误差与径向载荷的双螺母滚珠丝杠静刚度分析[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(24): 2952-2962.
[6]	郝壮壮, 张庆春, 胡云波, 郭宜斌, 王东华, 李玩幽. 齿面摩擦和几何偏心对含变位直齿轮啮合刚度的影响研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(23): 2812-2823.
[7]	琚春, 刘佳, 杨胜强, 张晶晶, 赵旭辉, . 叶片前后缘识别及百叶轮抛磨工艺研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(22): 2674-2683，2692.
[8]	梁小冰, 卢耀安, 王成勇, . 双转台五轴机床旋转轴位置无关几何误差的辨识[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(21): 2585-2591.
[9]	李光保, 高栋, 路勇, 平昊, 周愿愿. 自适应卡尔曼滤波与PSO-GA-BP算法的机器人误差补偿[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(20): 2456-2465.
[10]	杨继森, 周润, 张天恒, 卢渝, 吴灼, 张迪, 张静. 结构参数约束下的磁场补偿式双层时栅角位移传感器研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(19): 2296-2303，2312.
[11]	许立新, 夏晨, 杨博. 负载条件下RV减速器动态传动误差分析与试验[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(18): 2143-2152.
[12]	王伟, 马乾伦, 白振华, 王子昂. 基于梯度提升决策树的冷轧高强钢卷力学性能预测[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(18): 2222-2229.
[13]	孙家乐, 罗晨, 周怡君, 王伟, 张刚. 复杂视觉测量系统的标定参数优化及精度评估[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(14): 1741-1748,1755.
[14]	金鸿雁, 王磊, 赵希梅. 基于摩擦补偿的两轴直驱伺服进给系统自适应非线性滑模轮廓控制[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(11): 1335-1342.
[15]	李瑞君, 段刘辉, 赵文楷, 程真英, 范光照. 高精度微球半径测量模型及圆度评定方法比较[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(10): 1159-1163,1171.

滚动直线导轨副的滚道中心距误差与承载性能的关系

Relationship of Raceway Center Distance Errors and Load-bearing Performance of Rolling Linear Guide Pairs

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics