整体叶盘叶片型面高精度六轴检测与误差补偿方法研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2023.08.004

中国机械工程 ›› 2023, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (08): 908-915，922.DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2023.08.004

整体叶盘叶片型面高精度六轴检测与误差补偿方法研究

郑刚1;闫立方1;张开伟2;张旭3

1.上海应用技术大学上海物理气相沉积（PVD）超硬涂层及装备工程技术研究中心，上海，201418
2.上海大学机电工程与自动化学院，上海，200444
3.华中科技大学无锡研究院，无锡，214174

出版日期:2023-04-25 发布日期:2023-05-16
通讯作者: 张旭（通信作者），男，1982年生，教授。研究方向为曲面测量。E-mail：zhangxu@hust-wuxi.com。
作者简介:郑刚，男，1982年生，博士研究生。研究方向为曲面测量与数控加工技术。获发明专利10余项，发表论文20余篇。E-mail：zhenggang@sit.edu.cn。
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划（2018YFB1306802）

Research on High-precision Six-axis Detection and Error Compensation Method for Blisk Blade Profiles

ZHENG Gang1;YAN Lifang1;ZHANG Kaiwei2;ZHANG Xu3

1.Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Physical Vapor Deposition(PVD) Superhard Coating and
Equipment,Shanghai Institute of Technology,Shanghai,201418
2.School of Mechatronic Engineering and Automation,Shanghai University,Shanghai,200444
3.HUST-Wuxi Research Institute,Wuxi,Jiangsu,214174

Online:2023-04-25 Published:2023-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为提高三坐标测量机对整体叶盘的测量效率和精度，解决大尺寸整体叶盘超出测量机量程等问题，构建了基于三坐标测量机和高精度转台的六轴测量系统。依据空间坐标变换原理建立了转台坐标系与叶盘工件坐标系的数学模型，提出了一种整体叶盘不同叶片坐标系随转台旋转后的空间误差补偿方法。检测结果表明，在保证每个叶片型面参数测量精度满足工艺要求的前提下，测量效率平均提高了28.22%。对比未配置转台的测量数据，新的六轴测量系统测量水平整体叶盘叶片型面轮廓对比误差基本在0.008 mm以内，最大对比误差小于0.015 mm，比测量倾斜整体叶盘的误差更小且更稳定。

关键词: 三坐标测量机, 整体叶盘, 转台, 六轴系统, 误差补偿

Abstract: In order to improve the measurement efficiency and accuracy of the overall blisk by CMM and to solve the problems that large-sized blisk exceeded the measuring range of measuring machine, a six-axis measurement system was constructed based on CMM and a high-precision turntable. According to the principle of space coordinate transformation, a mathematical model of the turntable coordinate system and the blisk workpiece coordinate system were established. A space error compensation method was proposed after the coordinate systems of different blades of the blisk rotated with the turntable. Test results show that the measurement efficiency increases by 28.22% on average under the premise of ensuring that the measurement accuracy of each blade profile parameter meets the process requirements. Compared with the measurement data without the turntable, the new six-axis measurement system measures the horizontal blisk blade profile, and the profile comparison errors are almost all within 0.008 mm. The maximum comparison error is less than 0.015 mm, which is smaller and more stable than the measurement errors of the inclined blisk.

Key words: coordinate measuring machine(CMM), blisk, turntable, six-axis system, error compensation

中图分类号:

V263

郑刚, 闫立方, 张开伟, 张旭. 整体叶盘叶片型面高精度六轴检测与误差补偿方法研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(08): 908-915，922.

ZHENG Gang, YAN Lifang, ZHANG Kaiwei, ZHANG Xu. Research on High-precision Six-axis Detection and Error Compensation Method for Blisk Blade Profiles[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(08): 908-915，922.

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2023.08.004

http://www.cmemo.org.cn/CN/Y2023/V34/I08/908

参考文献

［1］陆佳艳,熊昌友,何小妹,等.航空发动机叶片型面测量方法评述［J］.计测技术,2009,29(3):1-3.
LU Jiayan, XIONG Changyou, HE Xiaomei, et al. Survey of Measurement Method of Aero-engine Blade［J］. Metrology & Measurement Technology, 2009,29(3):1-3.
［2］张国雄. 三坐标测量机的发展趋势［J］. 中国机械工程,2000(增刊1):231-235.
ZHANG Guoxiong. Automatic Inspection Feature Extraction and Recognition in CMM Inspection Planning［J］. China Mechanical Engineering,2000(S1):231-235.
［3］YU Jianhua, CHEN Zhitong, JIANG Zepeng. An Approach for Machining Distortion Measurements and Evaluation of Thin-walled Blades with Small Datum［J］.Chinese Journal of Aeronautics, 2016,29(6):1806-1814.
［4］SAVIO E, DE CHIFFRE L, SCHMITT R. Metrology of Freeform Shaped Parts［J］. CIRP Annals, 2007, 56(2):810-835.
［5］BOOTH M C, RIDDELL S G, WILSON M M. Template for Aligning Surface Features on a Rotor Blade:US 9624782［P］. 2017-04-18.
［6］GAO Y, LIN X, SHI Y, et al. Accessibility Analysis in Efficient Inspection of Closed Blisk on 3-axis CMM with 2-axis Probe Head［J］. Precision Engineering, 2019, 57:104-112.
［7］李学哲,石照耀,陈洪芳, 等.航空发动机叶片型面测量技术研究现状与趋势［J］.北京工业大学学报,2017,43(4):557-565.
LI Xuezhe, SHI Zhaoyao, CHEN Hongfang, et al. Current Status and Trends of Aerogengine Blade Profile Metrology［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2017, 43(4):557-565.
［8］蔺小军, 吴刚, 单秀峰, 等. 基于叶片截面线CMM测量数据的ICP配准改进算法［J］. 机械工程学报, 2020, 56(2):1-8.
LIN Xiaojun, WU Gang, SHAN Xiufeng, et al. An Improved ICP Registration Algorithm Based on CMM Measurement Data of Blade Section Line［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering, 2020, 56(2):1-8.
［9］孟书广.航空发动机复杂零部件的新型测量技术［J］.航空制造技术,2014(13):32-35.
MENG Shuguang. New Metrology Technique for Complex Components of Aero-engine［J］. Aeronautical Manufacturing Technology, 2014(13):32-35.
［10］ZHOU A, GUO J, SHAO W. Automated Inspection Planning of Freeform Surfaces for Manufacturing Applications［C］∥2011 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation. Beijing, 2011:2264-2269.
［11］SOUSA A R. Metrological Evaluation of a Coordinate Measuring Machine with 5-axis Measurement Technology［J］. Procedia CIRP, 2018, 75:367-372.
［12］ZHOU Z, ZHANG Y, TANG K. Sweep Scan Path Planning for Efficient Freeform Surface Inspection on Five-axis CMM［J］. Computer-Aided Design, 2016, 77:1-17.
［13］赵燎. 基于CMM的整体叶盘测量系统研究［D］. 成都：电子科技大学,2020.
ZHAO Liao. Research on CMM-based Measuring System of Blisk［D］. Chengdu:University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, 2020.
［14］HUANG N, BI Q, WANG Y. Identification of Two Different Geometric Error Definitions for the Rotary Axis of the 5-axis Machine Tools［J］. International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, 2015, 91:109-114.
［15］HUANG N, ZHANG S, BI Q, et al. Identification of Geometric Errors of Rotary Axes on 5-axis Machine Tools by On-machine Measurement［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2016, 84(1):505-512.
［16］LIU Y, WAN M, XIAO Q B, et al. Identification and Compensation of Geometric Errors of Rotary Axes in Five-axis Machine Tools through Constructing Equivalent Rotary Axis(ERA)［J］. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 2019, 152:211-227.
［17］WANG Z, ZHANG X, SHEN Y, et al. Pose Calibration of Line Structured Light Probe Based on Ball Bar Target in Cylindrical Coordinate Measuring Machines［J］. Measurement, 2021, 171:108760.
［18］ZHANG Y, SHEN Y, ZHANG W, et al. Generation of Efficient and Interference-free Scanning Path for Inspecting Impeller on a Cylindrical CMM［J］. Measurement, 2022,198:111352.
［19］徐永安,杨钦,怀进鹏.转台中心轴线标定误差分析与修正［J］.北京航空航天大学学报,2005(8):899-903.
XU Yongan, YANG Qin, HUAI Jinpeng. Analysis and Modification of Turntables Axis Calibration［J］. Journal of Beijing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005(8):899-903.
［20］潘金川, 刘胜兰, 张丽艳, 等.整体叶轮在分度装置装夹下的CMM测量方法研究［J］. 机械科学与技术, 2015, 34(9):1388-1393.
PAN Jinchuan, LIU Shenglan, ZHANG Liyan, et al. Research on Measuring Method of Monolithic Impeller with Dividing Apparatusvia CMM［J］. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering, 2015, 34(9):1388-1393.

[1]	刘毅, 易旺民, 姚建涛, 王兴达, 余鹏, 赵永生. 狭长空间内重载调姿装配机器人的设计与研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(02): 324-336.
[2]	叶伯生, 金雄程, 黎晗, 邵柏岩, 李晓昆, 李思澳. 伪目标迭代生成的机器人误差补偿算法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2024, 35(01): 136-143.
[3]	李光保, 高栋, 路勇, 平昊, 周愿愿. 自适应卡尔曼滤波与PSO-GA-BP算法的机器人误差补偿[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(20): 2456-2465.
[4]	王伟, 马乾伦, 白振华, 王子昂. 基于梯度提升决策树的冷轧高强钢卷力学性能预测[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(18): 2222-2229.
[5]	张军锋, 吴晓君, 史耀耀, 蔺小军. 基于Hertz接触理论的整体叶盘百页轮抛光材料去除深度建模研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(06): 668-676.
[6]	陈启迪, 胡小龙, 吝敏, 孙晓霞, 张涛, 周志雄. 超精密加工误差补偿技术研究综述[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(03): 253-268.
[7]	夏军勇, 刘科进, 钟飞, 孙颖. 运用改进的教学模拟退火算法辨识关节臂式三坐标测量机的结构参数[J]. 中国机械工程, 2023, 34(03): 314-323.
[8]	卢成伟, 钱博增, 王慧敏, 项四通. 工件分特征下的五轴数控机床关键几何误差分析与补偿方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(14): 1646-1653.
[9]	高文斌, 黄琪, 余晓流, . 模块化机器人几何误差分析及参数辨识研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(07): 811-817，851.
[10]	李耀仲, 王书亭, 蒋立泉, 孟杰, 谢远龙, . 基于稀疏节点快速扩展随机树的移动机械臂运动规划[J]. 中国机械工程, 2021, 32(12): 1462-1470.
[11]	吴锦辉1,2；陶友瑞1,2. 工业机器人定位精度可靠性研究现状综述[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(18): 2180-2188.
[12]	付国强, 饶勇建, 谢云鹏, 高宏力, 邓小雷. [误差建模及精度保证方法]几何误差贡献值影响下五轴数控机床运动轴误差灵敏度分析方法[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(13): 1518-1528.
[13]	刘世豪, 林茂. [综述]高速数控转台优化设计方法研究现状与展望[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(13): 1629-1637.
[14]	王建磊1;王云龙1;门川皓1;崔亚辉1;陈润霖1;王晓虎1;贾谦2. 精密磨床转台静压轴承的强健化设计[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(10): 1155-1161,1168.
[15]	孔骏成;李菊;沈惠平. 2-RPaRSS并联操作手运动副间隙误差分析及补偿[J]. 中国机械工程, 2020, 31(06): 706-713.

整体叶盘叶片型面高精度六轴检测与误差补偿方法研究

Research on High-precision Six-axis Detection and Error Compensation Method for Blisk Blade Profiles

PDF

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics