Experimental Investigation on Comprehensive Performance Comparison for Rail Grinding Using Abrasive Belt and Abrasive Wheel

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-132X.2022.17.014

Abstract

Abstract: Based on the self-developed lithium battery-driven rail abrasive belt and abrasive wheel grinding machine， the 60N rail profile was used as the experimental objects to comprehensively compare the performance of the new rail belt grinding technology and the traditional grinding wheel grinding technology. The results show that when the grinding pressure is in the range of 45 to 75 N， the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is about 15 to 30 times that of abrasive wheel grinding， while when the pressure is increased to 90 N， the material removal rate of abrasive belt grinding is as high as 102 times that of abrasive wheel grinding. The vibration acceleration， noise and energy consumption of abrasive belt grinding are less than that of abrasive wheel grinding. The abrasive belt grinding chips are banded， while the abrasive wheel grinding chips are molten at high temperature. At the same time， when the grinding pressure is increased to 105 N， the rail surface will turn blue after grinding， but the abrasive belt grinding will not. In addition， the lateral surface roughness of abrasive belt grinding is greater than that of abrasive wheel grinding， up to 8 μm， which meets the maximum 10 μm required by Chinese railway rail maintenance. To sum up， rail abrasive belt grinding technology is significantly superior to traditional abrasive wheel grinding technology in material removal rate， vibration， noise， energy consumption and temperature， etc. It is expected to be one of the effective methods to solve serious rail diseases in engineering practices.

Key words: rail grinding, abrasive belt, abrasive wheel, material removal, vibration, energy consumption

摘要： 基于自主研发的锂电驱动钢轨砂带打磨机和砂轮打磨机，以60N型钢轨廓形作为实验对象，全面对比了新型钢轨砂带打磨技术和传统砂轮打磨技术的性能。结果表明：当打磨压力在45～75 N范围内时，砂带打磨的材料去除率约为砂轮打磨的15～30倍，而当压力增大到90 N时，砂带打磨的材料去除率高达砂轮打磨的102倍；砂带打磨的振动加速度、噪声和能耗均小于砂轮打磨；砂带打磨切屑为带状，而砂轮打磨则表现为高温熔融状，同时当打磨压力增大到105 N时，砂轮打磨后钢轨表面会出现发蓝现象，而砂带打磨不会；此外，砂带打磨的横向表面粗糙度大于砂轮打磨，最高可达8 μm，但满足中国铁路钢轨养护要求的最大值10 μm。综上，钢轨砂带打磨技术在材料去除率、振动、噪声、能耗和温度等方面显著优于传统砂轮打磨技术，预期将成为工程实际中解决钢轨严重病害问题的有效方法之一。

关键词: 钢轨打磨, 砂带, 砂轮, 材料去除, 振动, 能耗

CLC Number:

TG580.6

WU Zhiwei, FAN Wengang, WANG Qian, LIU Yi, MA Tengfei, . Experimental Investigation on Comprehensive Performance Comparison for Rail Grinding Using Abrasive Belt and Abrasive Wheel[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2022, 33(17): 2125-2132.

吴志伟, 樊文刚, 王谦, 刘弋, 马腾飞, . 钢轨砂带打磨与砂轮打磨综合性能对比实验研究[J]. 中国机械工程, 2022, 33(17): 2125-2132.

References

［1］MICHAL S. Rolling Contact Fatigue in Relation to Rail Grinding［J］. Wear， 2016， 356/357：110-121.
［2］FAN Wengang， WANG Wenxi， WANG Junda， et al. Microscopic Contact Pressure and Material Removal Modeling in Rail Grinding Using Abrasive Belt［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part B：Journal of Engineering Manufacture， 2021， 235（1/2）：3-12.
［3］樊文刚，刘月明，李建勇. 高速铁路钢轨打磨技术的发展现状与展望［J］. 机械工程学报， 2018， 54（22）：184-193.
FAN Wengang， LIU Yueming， LI Jianyong. Development Status and Prospect of Rail Grinding Technology for High Speed Railway［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2018， 54（22）：184-193.
［4］刘月明，李建勇，蔡永林，等. 钢轨打磨技术现状和发展趋势［J］. 中国铁道科学， 2014， 35（4）：29-37.
LIU Yueming， LI Jianyong， CAI Yonglin， et al. Current State and Development Trend of Rail Grinding Technology［J］. China Railway Science， 2014， 35（4）：29-37.
［5］CUERVO P A， SANTA J F， TORO A. Correlations between Wear Mechanisms and Rail Grinding Operations in a Commercial Railroad［J］. Tribology International， 2015， 82：265-273.
［6］GU K K， LIN Q， WANG W J， et al. Analysis on the Effects of Rotational Speed of Grinding Stone on Removal Behavior of Rail Material［J］. Wear， 2015， 342/343：52-59.
［7］SANTA J F， TORO A， LEWIS R. Correlations between Rail Wear Rates and Operating Conditions in a Commercial Railroad［J］. Tribology International， 2016， 95：5-12.
［8］ZHANG Z Y， SHANG W， DING H H， et al. Thermal Model and Temperature Field in Rail Grinding Process Based on a Moving Heat Source［J］. Applied Thermal Engineering， 2016， 106：855-864.
［9］UHLMANN E， LYPOVKA P， HOCHSCHILD L， et al. Influence of Rail Grinding Process Parameters on rail Surface Roughness and Surface Layer Hardness［J］. Wear， 2016， 366/367：287-293.
［10］ROGER S， MARSHALL MATTHEW B， ROGER L， et al. Rail Grinding for the 21st Century-Taking a Lead from the Aerospace Industry［J］. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers， Part F：Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit， 2014， 229（5）：457-465.
［11］黄云. 砂带磨削技术的研究现状和发展方向简介［J］. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程， 2020， 40（3）：1-4.
HUANG Yun. Brief Introduction of Research Status and Development Direction of Abrasive Belt Grinding Technology［J］. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering， 2020， 40（3）：1-4.
［12］王文玺，李建勇，吴源，等. 钢轨砂带打磨残余应力的试验与仿真研究［J］. 金刚石与磨料磨具工程， 2020， 40（3）：5-12.
WANG Wenxi， LI Jianyong， WU Yuan， et al. Experimental and Simulation Investigation into Residual Stress for Railgrinding with Abrasive Belt［J］. Diamond & Abrasives Engineering， 2020， 40（3）：5-12.
［13］王文玺，李建勇，樊文刚，等. 基于赫兹接触的钢轨砂带打磨温度建模研究［J］. 铁道学报， 2019， 41（7）：141-146.
WANG Wenxi， LI Jianyong， FAN Wengang， et al. Modeling and Simulation of Temperature in Abrasive Belt Rail Grinding Process Based on Hertzian Contact Theory［J］. Journal of the China Railway Society， 2019， 41（7）：141-146.
［14］HE Zhe， LI Jianyong， LIU Yueming， et al. Investigating the Effects of Contact Pressure on Rail Material Abrasive Belt Grinding Performance［J］. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology， 2017， 93（1/4）：779-786.
［15］FAN Wengang， LIU Yueming， SONG Xiaoyang， et al. Influencing Mechanism of Rubber Wheel on Contact Pressure and Metal Removal in Corrugated Rail Grinding by Abrasive Belt［J］. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering， 2018， 140（12）：124501.
［16］樊文刚，刘月明，王文玺，等. 基于弹性赫兹接触的钢轨砂带打磨材料去除建模研究［J］. 机械工程学报， 2018， 54（15）：191-198.
FAN Wengang， LIU Yueming， WANG Wenxi， et al. Research on Modeling Method of Material Removal for Rail Grinding by Abrasive Belt Based on Elastic Hertzian Contact［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2018， 54（15）：191-198.
［17］CHENG Can， LI Jianyong， LIU Yueming， et al. Deep Convolutional Neural Network-based In-process Tool Condition Monitoring in Abrasive Belt Grinding［J］. Computers in Industry， 2019， 106：1-13.
［18］刘月明，何喆，王荣全，等. 钢轨试件砂带磨削行为试验研究［J］. 应用基础与工程科学学报， 2017， 25（2）：419-426.
LIU Yueming， HE Zhe， WANG Rongquan， et al. Experimental Investigation on Grinding Behavior of Abrasive Belt for Rail Specimen［J］. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering， 2017， 25（2）：419-426.
［19］周坤，王文健，刘启跃，等. 钢轨打磨机理研究进展及展望［J］. 中国机械工程， 2019， 30（3）：284-294.
ZHOU Kun， WANG Wenjian， LIU Qiyue， et al. Research Progresses and Prospect of Rail Grinding Mechanism［J］. Journal of Mechanical Engineering， 2019， 30（3）：284-294.

[1]	LIANG Chu-Bao, ZHANG Pei-Lin, CAO Jian-Jun, LIN Guo-Quan. A Denoising Method of Lifting Wavelet Package Gradual Changing Threshold Based on Ant Colony Optimization [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1964-1969.
[2]	SHANG Ze-Jin, WANG Zhong-Min. Bifurcation and Chaos of Forced Vibration for a Shape Memory Alloy Spring Oscillator  [J]. J4, 201016, 21(16): 1986-1991.
[3]	MA Qiaoying, YANG Shaopu, LIU Yongqiang, . Vibration and Lubrication Characteristics of Railway Vehicle Axle Box Bearings under Wheel-rail Excitation [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(04): 580-590.
[4]	WEN Zhiwei, LOU Junqiang, CHEN Tehuan, CUI Yuguo, WEI Yanding, LI Guoping. Vibration Mimicking Fish Body Wave and Flow Distribution of Underwater Flexible Structure with Resonant Actuation of Macro Fiber Composites [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(03): 405-413.
[5]	KANG Renke, LU Bingwei, CHEN Kailiang, LI Shengchao, DAI Jingbin, DONG Zhigang, BAO Yan. Study on Tearing of CFRP Thin Circular Tubes Machined by Ultrasonic Vibration Assisted Grinding [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(03): 524-533，540.
[6]	HUI Jizhuang, LUO Wei, ZHANG Zeyu, ZHANG Jun, WANG Jie. Research on Energy Transfer Model and Optimisation of Operating Parameters of Vibratory Rollers [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(03): 541-547.
[7]	ZHANG Lifeng, WANG Zixu, ZHANG Wangtong, DENG Yunfei, SUI He, GUO Zhiyong. Contrastive Experiments on Up and Down Grinding of Unidirectional Ceramic Matrix Composite C/SiC with Variable Angle [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(02): 235-243.
[8]	SHEN Minmin, SHI Rui, GUO Pengfei, YANG Yang, YANG Xiaodong, YANG Jihou. Study on Vibration and Fatigue of Distributed Connection Structures of Reusable Aircrafts [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(01): 45-55.
[9]	XIAO Gang, GU Hairui, DONG Jinjin, WANG Qibing, LU Jiawei. Simulation Data-driven Migration Diagnosis Method for Guide Rail Faults in Long-term Service Elevators [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2024, 35(01): 125-135.
[10]	WANG Zhiqiang, LEI Zhenyu. Analysis of Causes for Rail Corrugation on Steel Spring Floating Slab Tracks of Metro Small Radius Curves [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(24): 2899-2908.
[11]	XIE Yang, DAI Yiqun, ZHANG Chaoyong, LIU Jinfeng. A Method for Identifying and Predicting Energy Consumption of Machine Tools by Combining Integrated Models and Deep Learning [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(24): 2963-2974.
[12]	ZHANG Qicong, JIANG Chen, YE Hui, SHEN Lingxin, JIAO Mengdie. Design and Processing Research of Dynamic Pressure Assisted Non-Newtonian Fluid Polishing Tools [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(23): 2805-2811，2823.
[13]	JIA Zhixin, ZHANG Kaiyue, WANG Jin. Study on EDM of PCD by Mixing Iron Powders [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(22): 2684-2692.
[14]	ZHANG Lifeng, ZHANG Xiaoguang. Machining Performance and Material Removal Mechanism of High-speed Milling of CFRP with Variable Angle under Minimal Quantity Lubrication [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(21): 2622-2628.
[15]	BAI Xiaofan, LIU Zhiqiang, LIU Yanshi. Experiments and Analyses of Effects of Axial Low-frequency Vibration on Feed Forces of Cortical Bone Drilling [J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2023, 34(20): 2411-2427.